Thursday, December 22, 2011

Experts Predict US Property Market Will Reach Bottom in 2012

THURSDAY, 22 DECEMBER 2011

Image
Residential property prices in the United States are expected to fall by 1.57% in the fourth quarter of 2011, according to the December Zillow Home Price Expectations Survey.

Prices are forecasted to decline until the market's bottom is reached in late 2012 or early 2013. After 2013, the panelists expect a relatively steady annual appreciation rate of roughly 3% through to 2016, which is slightly below appreciation rates experienced during the pre-bubble years.

There is a consensus among the nation's top housing experts that we have not yet reached a bottom and are instead working through a prolonged bottoming process. Negative equity, unemployment and low consumer confidence remain the key factors delaying a true recovery,’ said Stan Humphries, Zillow chief economist.

This report suggests that the trend of eroding expectations for a housing market recovery has come to a halt. This is encouraging, but the average survey data are still consistent with a sluggish recovery scenario where eventual price increases will be less than those thought of as normal during the years preceding the national housing bubble,’ said Terry Loebs, founder of Pulsenomics, the firm that conducts the survey for Zillow.

Looking at the expected housing market performance through the five year period ending in 2016, there continues to be significant variation among the panelists regarding their individual home price forecasts. The most optimistic quartile of panelists projects nearly 18.3% price growth over the next five years, while the most pessimistic quartile projects a 1.4% decline.

Given the current economic climate and uncertainty around the government's future role in housing, it's not surprising to see such a wide dispersion in long term forecasts. As the market starts to stabilize, we should see individual forecasts start to converge,’ explained Humphries.

In the December survey, the panelists also offered their views on last month's increase to loan limits for Federal Housing Administration (FHA) mortgages, as well as their assessments of the likelihood that the FHA would require a federal government bailout within the next two years.

Among other findings on these matters, the panelists were almost equally split on the loan limit increase, with 51% opposed and 49% in favour of it. Some 28% of the 91 panelists who expressed a view indicated the likelihood of a bailout of the FHA by the federal government within the coming two years as high or very high.

The survey panel included a diverse group of economists, real estate experts, and investment and market strategists. The survey is based on the projected path of the S&P/Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index over the coming five years.

http://www.propertywire.com/news/north-america/us-real-estate-outlook-201112225905.html

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

CNN Money: Best Places To Be a Landlord

Based on home prices, area economy and rents, and ranked by job growth, per Local Market Monitor:

Best places to be a landlord 

1. Houston 2.5% Annual job growth:

Projected 3-year rent increase: 18%
Q2 home price: $174,000
Current monthly rent: $818

2. Grand Rapids 2.4% Annual job growth:

Projected 3-year rent increase: 15%
Q2 home price: $128,000
Current monthly rent: $636

3. Rochester, N.Y. 2.3% Annual job growth:

Projected 3-year rent increase: 25%
Q2 home price: $148,000
Current monthly rent: $785

4. Dallas 2.2% Annual job growth:

Projected 3-year rent increase: 16%
Q2 home price: $166,000
Current monthly rent: $877

5. Tulsa 1.8% Annual job growth:

Projected 3-year rent increase: 19%
Q2 home price: $146,000
Current monthly rent: $671


Forbes: Texas tops the list of the best states for jobs

The Texas jobs miracle has received a lot of attention since Rick Perry announced his candidacy for president in August. The numbers are impressive. Texas added 1.2 million net jobs since Perry took office as Texas Governor in December 2000, while the U.S. as a whole lost 1.1 million jobs during the same time.
The gains have been fueled by a 40 percent rise in education and health services jobs the past decade, as well as a 67 percent jump in mining jobs, which includes the thriving oil industry. The jury is still out whether Perry can convince voters that his success in Texas can work on a national scale, but it remains that the Texas jobs story is far from over.


Texas leads the way when it comes to states that will add the most jobs over the next five years on a percentage basis. Total employment in Texas is forecasted to expand 2.9 percent annually through 2015 according to research firm Moody’s Analytics. That represents 1.6 million new net jobs for the state over five years.

Texas offers a low tax, business friendly climate with a surging population that offers a nearly unlimited supply of young labor. Texas ranks sixth in our look at the Best States for Business and Careers. The state has aggressively courted companies to come to Texas to take advantage of these attributes. “Everyone is singing from the same hymn book at the Austin Chamber of Commerce,” says Moody’s Analytics chief economist Mark Zandi.

Gov. Perry sent letters to roughly 90 Washington State companies including Amazon.com, Microsoft and Starbucks last year when Washington was considering a tax increase on the state’s top earners. Perry wrote:
“As the State of Washington considers a multibillion-dollar tax increase for citizens and businesses … I invite you to consider your future in America’s new land of opportunity: the State of Texas. If Washington doesn’t want your business, Texas does. Texas has no personal income tax and no interest in getting one.”
The state uses its Texas Enterprise Fund to sweeten economic development deals for companies that are looking to relocate or expand. General Electric, eBay, Electronic Arts, 3M and TD Ameritrade have all announced expansion plans this year with help from the Texas Enterprise Fund.

The job picture in Texas is not all rosy. The state’s population is growing so quickly that despite the job gains, unemployment is 8.5 percent, the highest in 24 years. It is double the rate from 2007. Minimum wage jobs represented 9.5 percent of Texas’ hourly workforce last year which is the highest rate in the country.
The No. 2 state for job growth over the next five years is Nevada which Moody’s forecasts will expand 2.9 percent annually (Texas nips Nevada if you do not round the growth rates). Nevada has been decimated by the collapse of the housing market and recession. Home prices are off 60 percent and unemployment has soared from 4.2 percent five years ago to a recent 13.4 percent, the highest in the U.S.
 
Yet Nevada and the rest of the southwest remains an attractive spot for businesses thanks to low business costs relative to California, an abundance of land and its proximity to Mexico. Arizona (No. 3), New Mexico (No. 4) and Oklahoma (No. 8) all expect strong employment gains.
 
Most of the states expecting strong job gains have one thing in common: all but two (New Mexico and Oregon) are right-to-work states. These states give employees the right to decide if they want to join a union or not. There are 22 right-to-work states.

Economist Arthur Laffer pulled together economic data on states as part of a new book, "Eureka! How to Fix California," being published in February by California think tank Pacific Research Institute. Laffer found that in the past decade right-to-work states outperformed their union-shop counterparts in almost every metric. Gross state product growth was 53 percent versus 42 percent. Personal incomes rose 50 percent compared to 39 percent for union states. Job growth was 2.8 percent versus -1.3 percent and the population increase was 12 percent opposed to 6 percent.

Companies are increasingly shunning union-shop states. Boeing is currently battling the National Labor Relations Board over its right to operate a $750 million aircraft assembly line in South Carolina instead of Washington State. The NLRB claims Boeing located the plant in South Carolina in retaliation for Boeing union workers in Washington going on strike. Boeing cites lower business costs in its choice of South Carolina for the plant.

By